Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Marriage is a word that instills a different meaning in every person that hears it. Some people think of the religious meaning, two people joined together in the eyes of God. Others don't involve a god into their union and see it as a union between two people. Occasionally people don't take marriage seriously and just consider it the next step after dating. Whatever the opinion, every person, whether married or single, has his or her own opinion of what a marriage is and what it entails. In the poems A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning by John Donne and Conjoined by Judith Minty the reader sees two different views of love and the authors use metaphors to help explain their opinions of love and marriage.
In John Donne’s poem he explains the two lover’s love with a spiritual and cosmology metaphor. The title says that 'when we are apart we must not mourn'. In the first stanza John uses a metaphysical conceit when comparing their separation to two men dying. While Donne and his wife are apart, they cannot express physical love; thus, they are like the body of the dead man. However, Donne says, they remain united spiritually and intellectually because their souls are one. He says that while he must leave and the physical bond that units them 'melts' there is no need to cry 'tear-floods' as this is demeaning to our love. Unlike the many ordinary people or “laity”, their love extends beyond the physical attraction and it doesn't depend entirely on flesh and sexual attraction which the rest of the world defines their love. Donne likened the lovers to the planets. The same perfect spheres that are different entities but always remain the same. Their profound love is greater and finer than that of ordinary people. Their perfect spherical love belongs with the great planets and the stars. The trepidation of the spheres is movements of the planets and the general sense of movement to us is earthquakes and although these cause alarm they are slight movements compared to the trepidation of the planets because the movement of the universe, though greater, does not cause alarm. By using this metaphor of the movement of planets and the earthquakes is that "ordinary" lovers may fear and lament their separation, but the lovers, who are superior to them, can take theirs calmly, for they are never really parted. The main metaphor in this poem is when John Donne speaks about a compass, how you can pull the ends away from each other but never will be fully apart. They are connected at one point, creating a perfect circle of love. The circle also suggests it will last forever. The concept of death is turned into a celebration of love through clever metaphors, imagery and conceits by John Donne. This couple is different to most because there relationship is not idealistic. It is real and very deep, the fact that they see death as a beginning rather than an end shows a lot to there feelings. The comparisons made between this relationship and that of other peoples shows it is the souls that are in love, rather than the physical beings.
Judith Minty also uses metaphors in her poem as she explains the unhappiness of a marriage gone wrong. In the very first line, the onion is called a monster. It is two onions only “joined by a transparent skin.” The skin is the joining of marriage of the two onions. The deformity of the two onions “each half-round, then flat and deformed… where it pressed and grew together” puts a slight tilt on the joining. Where the two onions come into contact with each other they have warped and deformed. This transparent skin has held and warped the two onions into the monster of one union. The Chinese Siamese twins used are another example of the deformity of marriage. “Or like those freaks, Chang and Eng, twins… joined at the chest by skin and muscle, doomed”. This line describes the agony and pain of being joined physically with someone. These twins go though life never alone with one moment of peace. To feel the agitation of knowing they can never be separated from another is beyond the comprehension of most people. Such a permanent joining of two uniquely different beings drives the image of suffering into the mind. The deformed calf with the two heads from the result of a birth defect also shows another example of marriage. “An accident, like the two-headed calf rooted… in one body, fighting to suck at its mother’s teats” shows such deep sorrow and anguish. The use of such a pitiful creature as an example again reaches inside to dig out the feelings of remorse and pity.
Both of these poems have opposing views of marriage and love. Judith Minty’s poem explains more of a physical bond and John Donne’s poem opposes that. Ultimately, the usage of metaphors in both poems helps to better explain the relationship with the speaker and how the author views love and marriage.

4 comments:

  1. 1. Your thesis is a solid, simple thesis. I think you could add more literary devices in your thesis that the authors use. Like how is the tone different in each poem. Also, what is the greater meaning of each poem. YOu could say how these differences help the greater meaning to come out.
    2. So I think you need some more direct quotes from Valediction. YOu don't really have any direct quotes. This could also help you from summarizing the text. I do think summary is needed for this poem though. YOu do a very good job in the second body paragraph with quoting. YOu need more quotes in with Valediction because you need to show were these metaphors are.
    3. You do a very good job analyzing each metaphor in each poem. But you need to discuss how the poems are different in how they view marriage. You analyze the metaphors great but how are the metaphors different from each poem. Also, how do these metaphors contribute to each poem's greater meaning.
    4.YOu have metaphors but you could use tone as well to show the differnce in each poem. Valediction has a positive tone and the words are beautiful and expressive. Conjoined is kinda like a pessimistic when the speaker thinks about her marriage. The tone is negative because of the words like monster and suffocating. So you could discuss the difference in that with tone.
    5. No you don't have any misinterpretations. YOu do a very good job staying on track with your thesis and stuff.
    6. What us the tone of each poem?
    What is the greater meaning of each poem and how they differ?
    Does the time difference of each poem give anything difference from each poem? Ones older and the other is contemporary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1.Your thesis does say that each poem as a different view, but you don't explain what each is, or what devices are used in each to show their views. You could maybe say that they both use metaphors to show such and such, since you used the metaphors in your essay.
    2.I think, in the Valediction paragraph especially, you need more direct quotes. You do a good job analyzing the compass and planets parts, but without actually including the quotes. Try to include them, so you can show your conclusions from the text, and so it doesn't just look like summary.
    3.Again, you analyzed the metaphors well, they just weren't quoted in the beginning. You did a good job in the Conjoined paragraph, though.
    4.You did use literary devices, with the metaphors, but maybe you could find other devices to include as well. You could include the tones of the poems, or diction.
    5.I didn't see any misinterpretations. Everything made sense that you said.
    6.(Thesis)What devices were used by the authors to illustrate their views?
    How were the views of relationships different?
    What were the greater meanings of the poems?

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. Loved your intro idea. Very simple thesis, I think you got the idea but I'm sure there's stuff other than metaphors.

    2. Good job overall. Like me, you seemed to have an easier time with Conjoined. ^^ I think you can be more specific with the Valediction paragraph.

    3.Your commentary is great. Just add some quotes before the lines you already has.

    4. Repeat. Metaphors are good, try to find some other stuff.

    5. I don't think so. :-)

    6. What is the point of these poems?
    How do their greater meanings relate?
    What other devices were used?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The feedback I received on my essay was about how I had a simple thesis and mainly that I shoul hve quoted more from the text in my valediction paragraph. The feedback from my classmates was very helpful because alot of things they pointed out I was very unaware of. I learned alot of different interpretations of the two poems by reading my classmates essays. They had different ideas about how they went about their essays which I enjoyed to read. I will use this information to revise by adjusting my thesis and my first body paragraph. In my thesis I need to include more techniques used by the author other than metaphors and in my valediction paragraph I nerd to add more quotes which seemed to be my biggest weakness. I feel my essay will be alot better now because the vhnges that would be made are what my comments are referring to which will strengthen my essay alot and hopefully it will not hve as many errors uch as little things as referring to the text rather than summarizing.

    ReplyDelete